57. Select McDonnell Douglas, 411 You.S. within 804-05 (statistical facts demonstrating a keen employer’s standard policy otherwise routine is applicable to if or not personal a career decision try discriminatory); Bell v. E.P.An excellent., 232 F.3d 546, 553-54 (seventh Cir. 2000) (saying statistical facts is “strongly related and you can probative of dilemma of pretext whether or not it is not enough to support a pattern and practice different procedures case” and you will “the data one blacks commonly marketed as frequently because the nonblacks, whether or not maybe not mathematically high, remains circumstantial proof of you are able to discrimination”).

58. Pick Furnco Constr. Corp. v. Waters, 438 You.S. 567, 579-80 (1978) (when you are “[a] racially healthy employees you should never immunize an employer out-of liability for specific acts out-of discrimination, . . . [p]roof one [the new employer’s] associates is racially healthy or it contains good disproportionately large part of fraction group is not completely unimportant”).